【2026年版】英検®準1級ライティング予想問題！英文要約・英作文を模範解答つきで紹介

Virtual reality (VR) technology has been in use for entertainment, especially in gaming applications. Nowadays, some schools have begun experimenting with virtual reality headsets in the classroom. With these devices, students can stand on a virtual volcano, walk through ancient cities, or observe the inside of the human body in three dimensions.

Supporters argue that such experiences make abstract concepts easier to understand and help students remember what they learn for a longer time. In addition, they claim that VR lessons can reduce inequality in education. Even if schools cannot afford real science laboratories or overseas study trips, VR headsets can provide similar experiences at a relatively low cost. They believe that, if used correctly, VR could give students in remote or poor areas access to the same quality of lessons as students in rich cities.

However, critics have serious concerns. Some doctors warn that long periods of VR use may strain students’ eyes or cause headaches and dizziness. Others point out that students wearing headsets cannot easily communicate with classmates, which may weaken their social skills. Furthermore, the initial cost of VR equipment remains high, so the technology might actually increase the gap between rich and poor schools instead of closing it.

(203 words)

Some schools are starting to use virtual reality headsets to create digital classrooms. Supporters believe VR clarifies complex concepts and promotes educational equality for disadvantaged students by offering low-cost alternatives to expensive field trips. However, critics worry about health problems, social isolation, and unequal access for poorer schools. They argue that clear safety guidelines and financial support are needed before VR becomes a normal part of education worldwide.

(68 words) 

I think that schools should replace printed textbooks with tablet devices. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, tablet devices can reduce costs and protect the environment. Instead of printing new textbooks every few years, schools can simply update digital data. For example, students can download the latest versions of their textbooks without wasting paper or paying for expensive reprints.

Second of all, tablets improve access to information. Students can quickly look up unfamiliar words, watch short videos, and read extra materials related to the lesson. For instance, a student studying history can open maps or original documents online, which deepens their understanding of the topic.

Due to the reasons stated above, I think that tablet devices should replace printed textbooks in schools.

(127 words)

I think that schools should not replace printed textbooks with tablet devices. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, using tablet devices for long periods of time can harm students’ health. Staring at bright screens every day may cause eye strain and sleep problems. For example, some students already spend many hours using smartphones, so adding more screen time at school would make the situation worse.

Second of all, tablet devices can easily distract students from studying. Since tablet devices can connect to the Internet, students may secretly play games or watch videos in class. For instance, a student might pretend to read a digital textbook while actually checking social media.

Due to the reasons stated above, I think that schools should continue to use printed textbooks instead of replacing them with tablet devices.

(138 words)

I think that allowing employees to work remotely is beneficial for companies. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, remote work can increase productivity. Many workers can concentrate better at home because they do not waste time commuting or talking unnecessarily with coworkers. For example, some companies report that employees finish tasks faster after they are given the option to work from home several days a week.

Second of all, remote work improves work–life balance. When employees can choose where they work, it is easier for them to spend time with their families or take care of personal matters. For instance, parents can look after their children after school without quitting their jobs.

In conclusion, I think that companies should encourage remote work for their employees.

(130 words)

I think that allowing employees to work remotely is not always beneficial for companies. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, remote work makes communication more difficult. Online meetings cannot fully replace face-to-face conversations, and misunderstandings may increase. For example, it is harder for new employees to ask quick questions or learn company rules when everyone is working from home.

Second of all, remote work can make it difficult for managers to evaluate performance. When they cannot see employees directly, they may not notice who is struggling or who needs support. For instance, a worker who quietly faces problems at home might fall behind without anyone realizing it.

In conclusion, I think that companies should be careful about encouraging remote work.

(125 words) 

I think that governments should invest more in space exploration. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, space programs lead to new technologies that benefit everyday life. Many inventions such as satellite navigation and weather forecasting were developed for space exploration projects. For example, accurate satellite data now helps farmers decide when to plant crops and allows ships and airplanes to travel more safely.

Second of all, space exploration can help protect the Earth in the long term. By studying other planets and asteroids, scientists can learn how to prevent dangerous impacts or understand climate change better. For instance, observing Mars and Venus provides us insights about what might happen if the Earth’s atmosphere changes drastically.

For these reasons above, I think that governments should spend more money on space exploration.

(135 words)

I think that governments should not invest more in space exploration. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, space programs cost enormous amounts of money. Governments are already struggling to pay for education, health care, and social welfare. For example, instead of building new rockets, that money could be used to improve hospitals or support low-income families.

Second of all, space exploration does not directly solve urgent problems on Earth. Many people suffer from poverty, natural disasters, and environmental pollution. For instance, sending robots to distant planets will not immediately provide clean water or safe housing for people in need.

For these reasons stated above, I think that governments should focus on solving problems on Earth rather than investing more in space exploration.

(127 words) 

I think that university education should be free for everyone. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, free tuition would make education more equal. At the moment, many talented students cannot attend university because their families cannot afford the high fees. For example, a student from a low-income household may give up on becoming a doctor or engineer even though they have excellent grades.

Second of all, free university education would benefit the national economy. When more people receive advanced education, they can create new businesses and technologies. For instance, highly educated workers can develop innovative products that are exported overseas, which brings more money into the country.

To conclude, I think that university education should be free for everyone.

(124 words)

I think that university education should not be completely free for everyone. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, making tuition free would create a heavy tax burden. The government would need to collect more money from citizens to pay for all universities. For example, people who do not attend university would still have to pay higher taxes to support other students.

Second of all, if universities are free, some students may lose motivation. When people do not pay any tuition, they might enroll without seriously thinking about their goals. For instance, students could skip classes or take many years to graduate because they do not feel any financial pressure.

To conclude, I think that university education should not be completely free.

(126 words)

I think that social media does more harm than good. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, social media can damage people’s mental health. Users often compare themselves with others who only post happy or successful moments. For example, teenagers may feel lonely or depressed when they see pictures of friends enjoying parties they were not invited to, or when their posts receive fewer likes than others.

Second of all, social media spreads misinformation very quickly. False stories can reach millions of people before they are corrected, and not everyone checks reliable sources. For instance, incorrect health advice or rumors about disasters can cause fear and confusion among the public and may even lead to dangerous behavior.

Because of the reasons stated above, I think that social media has a negative effect on society overall.

(139 words)

I think that social media does not do more harm than good. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, social media helps people stay connected. Family members and friends who live far away can easily share messages, photos, and videos and support each other emotionally. For example, workers living abroad can talk with their parents every day at almost no cost and feel less homesick.

Second of all, social media provides useful information for businesses and individuals. Small shops can advertise their products without paying for expensive TV commercials, and users can discover local services. For instance, a local bakery can attract customers by posting pictures of new cakes online and receiving feedback from followers.

Because of the reasons stated above, I think that social media brings more benefits than harm to modern life.

(138 words) 

I think that zoos should be abolished. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, many animals suffer when they are kept in small cages. Wild animals usually move over large areas, but zoo enclosures often cannot provide enough space. For example, big cats may walk in circles again and again, which is a sign of stress and frustration.

Second of all, modern technology can replace traditional zoos for educational purposes. People can watch high-quality nature documentaries or experience virtual safaris without locking animals in cages. For instance, students can learn about wildlife through interactive videos that show animals behaving naturally in their own habitats.

In conclusion, I think that keeping animals in zoos is unnecessary and should be stopped.

(123 words)

I think that zoos should not be abolished. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, zoos play an important role in wildlife conservation. Many endangered species are protected and bred in zoos, and some are later returned to the wild. For example, certain rare birds and mammals have survived only because zoos created special breeding programs for them.

Second of all, zoos provide valuable educational opportunities. Children who visit zoos can see real animals and develop interest in nature. For instance, a student who watches a live elephant or polar bear may be inspired to learn more about environmental protection.

In conclusion, I think that zoos should continue to exist, with strong rules to protect animal welfare.

(121 words) 

I think that cities should do more to promote bicycle use. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, riding bicycles improves people’s health. Many city residents do not get enough exercise because they sit at desks all day. For example, if people commute by bicycle instead of driving, they can strengthen their muscles and reduce the risk of lifestyle related illnesses.

Second of all, bicycles are better for the environment than cars. Bicycles do not produce exhaust gases, so they help reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, if more people ride bicycles for short trips, cities can become cleaner and quieter.

To conclude, I think that city governments should build more bicycle lanes and encourage people to cycle.

(125 words)

I think that cities should not strongly promote bicycle use. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, riding bicycles in crowded cities can be dangerous. When there are many cars, buses, and pedestrians, accidents are more likely to occur. For example, cyclists may suddenly appear in a driver’s blind spot and get involved in an accident, or collide with pedestrians.

Second of all, bicycles are not convenient for everyone. Elderly people, people with disabilities, or parents with several children may find it difficult to use bicycles for daily transportation. For instance, carrying heavy groceries or luggage on a bicycle is often unsafe and uncomfortable.

To conclude, I think that cities should improve overall public transportation rather than focusing mainly on bicycles.

(125 words) 

I think that having part-time jobs is good for high school students. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, part-time work teaches responsibility. Students must arrive on time, follow instructions, and cooperate with coworkers. For example, a student who works at a convenience store learns how to handle money responsibly and speak politely to customers.

Second of all, part-time jobs provide valuable real-world experience. Students can discover what kind of work suits them before choosing a future career. For instance, a student who enjoys helping customers in a café may decide to study hospitality or business at university.

Because of the reasons stated above, I think that high school students can benefit greatly from part-time jobs if their working hours are limited.

(126 words)

I think that having part-time jobs is not good for high school students. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, part-time work reduces the time available for studying and rest. Students who work late at night may feel tired in class which can lead to reduced academic performance. For example, a student who works several evenings a week may not have enough energy to concentrate on homework.

Second of all, part-time jobs can cause stress. Dealing with angry customers or strict bosses is difficult even for adults. For instance, a shy student might lose confidence if they are told off at work for small mistakes.

Because of the reasons stated above, I think that high school students should focus on their studies rather than working part-time.

(130 words) 

I think that tourism to fragile natural areas should be strictly limited. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, too many visitors can seriously damage the environment. Fragile ecosystems, such as coral reefs and mountain forests, take a long time to recover from harm. For example, careless tourists may step on rare plants or leave trash, which destroys habitats for wildlife.

Second of all, limiting tourism can improve the quality of visitors’ experiences. When popular sites are overcrowded, people cannot enjoy the scenery peacefully. For instance, a small number of carefully managed tours can provide better guidance and deeper learning about nature.

In conclusion, I think that governments should control the number of tourists in fragile natural areas.

(122 words)

I think that tourism to fragile natural areas should not be too strictly limited. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, tourism supports the local economy. People living near national parks or beautiful beaches often depend on visitors for their income. For example, closing popular sites would hurt hotels, restaurants, and tour guides who rely on tourists.

Second of all, responsible tourism can increase public interest in environmental protection. When people see beautiful nature with their own eyes, they may be more willing to protect it. For instance, visitors who learn about endangered animals during guided tours might later donate to conservation projects.

In conclusion, I think that tourism should be carefully managed but not heavily restricted.

(121 words) 

I think that cashless payments should eventually replace cash in society. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, cashless systems are convenient and efficient. People can pay quickly with cards or smartphones without carrying heavy wallets or counting coins. For example, commuters can pass through ticket gates smoothly when transportation cards are used instead of buying paper tickets.

Second of all, electronic payments can improve security. Digital records make it easier to track illegal transactions and reduce the risk of theft. For instance, if a smartphone is lost, the owner can block the payment app, but stolen cash can never be recovered.

To conclude, I think that cashless payments should become the main method of payment in the future.

(123 words)

I think that cashless payments should not completely replace cash in society. There are two reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, some people find digital systems difficult to use. Elderly people or those without smartphones may be excluded if cash disappears. For example, an older person who is not familiar with payment apps or smartphones might feel nervous and avoid shopping.

Second of all, cashless payments depend on technology, which can fail. Sudden power cuts, system errors, or network failures could suddenly stop all transactions. For instance, if the network goes down during a disaster, people would not be able to buy food or medicine.

To conclude, I think that society should keep both cash and cashless payment methods.

(121 words)